![matchguns mg2 manual matchguns mg2 manual](https://images.proxibid.com/AuctionImages/2849/165775/FullDetail/3127_1.jpg)
![matchguns mg2 manual matchguns mg2 manual](http://www.aseliikerantanen.fi/product_pictures/big/Matchguns+MG2+Rapid+Fire%2C+cal+22+LR%2C+TT%3D3-4599.jpg)
This is an answer to the letter from Bob Riegl, dated Mars 6. In all fairness, I have been informed that this problem has been addressed with modifications to the magazine and the gun now performs "flawlessly." If I didn't love my Pardini SP & HP, and felt the need for another Standard Pistol I would get another MG2 tomorrow. In all fariness the fault lay with the tubular magazine, in that the cartrdige catch was not beefy enough and allowed rounds to pour into the gun jamming the interior. A dialogue began between myself, Don Nygord and Morini-which ended in my returning the gun for a refund. It seems to me that this guns are still prototypes, that need thorough tuning before they come of age.ĭoes anybody else have experiences with this gun? Please bring your information.īob Riegl wrote:I owned one of the first imported into the states and I was very impressed with (a) Trigger, (b) grips and the adjustments, (c) the sights, (d) the hold, (e) recoil control-I really liked the gun and thought it was a keeper after a (1) Baikal, (2) Hammerli 208s, (3) Unique DES 69U-I started shooting the gun and began experiencing severe jams that required the barrel removal in order to clear.
![matchguns mg2 manual matchguns mg2 manual](https://eletrak.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/6/6/126685376/420465013_orig.jpg)
This is a pity, because this gun would be a very nice one, with the sight and functioning flaws corrected. This does happen with different brands of ammo, both mild target ammo and standard velocity ammo. The gun has a tendency to only half-cycle, then it will put the fired enty back into the chamber. The functioning improved, but was still not reliable. These were exchanged with plastic followers with a slightly different feeding angle. Part of the problem was related to the magazine followers. The reliability of functioning av the CM22 is not satisfactory. Is you are using a low hold on the target, then you will have to grind the front blade down guite a bit. The sights are nice, but with unsufficient lelevation adjustability.
#Matchguns mg2 manual full#
The trigger unit is nice, with full adjustability and with adjustment locking screws. The balance is very front heavy, which is probably beneficial for rapid fire. On the positive side the gun has attractive looks. It is an ingenious gun, involving some enginering solutions seldome seen. Yes, I have relatively long experience with the CM22 (steel version) and the CM32. All the opnions are very welcomed and much appreciated. I know I cannot go wrong with either, but I'd like to hear any particular things about them that you may have to say. Unfortunately I don't have an access to them to try shooting or holding. I am going to buy a pistol for standard shooting comp and I need to choose between these 2 and in the case of CM also between alu and steel version. Does anyone have any experience shooting these guns or has a reliable third party information (friends, shooters at the range, test/reviews, etc) regarding them?